Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Slash Open Source Project

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • by Enrico Pulatzo (7139) on Tuesday September 06 2005, @02:41PM (#6267)
    Those designers that you've linked to (seem to) no little (and care little) about the reasons why xhtml isn't really xml since it's not served as xml, thereby making all of their reasons for using xhtml over html moot.

    HTML 4 is just as semantically complete as xhtml, and if xhtml isn't served as xml you get zero benefits from the xml-ness of the document.

    HTML 4 was the best choice for this and I applaud the slashcode team of making the right choice, not the popular one.
    • Re:xhtml by ARC (Score:1) Tuesday September 06 2005, @03:00PM
      • Re:xhtml by Enrico Pulatzo (Score:1) Tuesday September 06 2005, @05:39PM
        • Re:xhtml by ARC (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @08:27AM
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:16PM (#6327)
    This is why [hixie.ch]