Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
OSTG
Thinkgeek
Slashdot
NewsForge
Linux.com
ITMJ
IT Product Guide
SourceForge
freshmeat
Newsletters
Slashcode
Slash Open Source Project
Navigation
About
FAQ
Journals
Messages
Topics
Editors
Older Stuff
Past Polls
Submit Story
Create Account/Log in
Stuff
Brian (aka Krow)
Pudge
ACS
Tangent
Use Perl
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Slash Shell Administrations, A Necessity?
More
|
Login
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to use
the classic discussion system
instead. If you
login
, you can remember this preference.
Slash Shell Administrations, A Necessity?
2
Comments
More
|
Login
/
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
More
|
Login
Please Log In to Continue
Log In
Nickname
Password
Public Terminal
[
Create a new account
]
Loading... please wait.
It is necessary
(
Score:2
)
by
tf23 (175)
Until an admin can upload a file through HTML, and move/delete/rename/copy files via the interface.
Once someone does that code for slash, I don't see any reason why someone couldn't run an entire slashsite w/o shell access.
--
lottadot
[lottadot.com]
Re:It is necessary
(
Score:1
)
by
Micah (1747)
<
micah AT 'ABSOLU ... s4christ DOT org
> on Monday November 26 2001, @06:51PM (
#3722
)
Homepage
well, there's always FTP or better yet SCP...
--
Yoder Internet Development
[yoderdev.com]: Honest and Affordable Web Solutions
Parent
Get More Comments
It is necessary (Score:2)
Once someone does that code for slash, I don't see any reason why someone couldn't run an entire slashsite w/o shell access.
lottadot [lottadot.com]
Re:It is necessary (Score:1)
Yoder Internet Development [yoderdev.com]: Honest and Affordable Web Solutions
Parent