Running the main page of this site through validator.w3.org, reveals 8 HTML errors. Even if you switched to HTML 4.01 transitional, you'd still have 4 errors. So you've got some work to do there.
When validating the article page itself, there's 9 errors.
Valid HTML, will keep you from having CSS issues in some cases.
As for the CSS itself, if you run that through a validator (a good one's at http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ [w3.org] ), you'll also find you have an error and a couple warnings to deal with.
val
by
Anonymous Coward
on Wednesday September 07 2005, @09:31AM
(#6304)
Sometimes those validators can be misleading, especially with code generated from dymanic sites. You can also use validators on just the CSS locally, or you can cut and paste the CSS or HTML code into the validator and it can give you warnings, deprecation, and other notes.
It's a great place to start though I agree.
Do you know what a validator is? (Score:1)
Re:Do you know what a validator is? (Score:0)
Re:Do you know what a validator is? (Score:0)
Parent