Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

Slash Open Source Project

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Loading... please wait.
  • by alexmc (524) on Wednesday June 06 2001, @03:18AM (#2734) Homepage
    I think fmartini is wrong and should have settled straight away out of court - thus saving most of 16000 dollars in legal fees.

    If the institution did have a trademark on Reading Recovery as was claimed then they were perfectly right to stop someone else using it.

    Your issue seems to be one of timing - why didn't they complain earlier. As far as I see it they probably thought you were too unimportant before to bother with. But when you started to damage their trademark by using it on a "popular" site that was when they brought the lawsuit.

    This is too unrelated to Slash. I don't know why am responding to this thread.

    --
    http://news.DiverseBooks.com/ SF and Computing Book News